The Obscenity Trial Of "Lady Chatterley's Lover"

By | June 20, 2022

test article image
On the London Underground, a commuter reads a copy of D H Lawrence's "Lady Chatterley's Lover," unaware of the fellow passengers surreptitiously reading over his shoulder, November 3, 1960. (Fox Photos/Hulton Archive/Getty Images)

English author D.H. Lawrence was known for pushing the envelope, but his final novel, Lady Chatterley's Lover, caused such an uproar in the U.K. that it wasn't published in its entirety for 30 years after its official release. Although far from shocking by today's standards, the novel was considered obscene, and Lawrence was dismissed as a pornographer who wasted his talent.

Lady Chatterley's Lover

The young and pretty Constance Reid, married to the handsome upper-class Sir Clifford Chatterley, spends much of the book wrestling with her carnal desires after a battlefield injury leaves her husband paralyzed from the waist down and unable to perform his marital duties. When she begins an affair with the estate gamekeeper, she finds that love can exist entirely outside the mind. Although those parts of the book received the most attention, the novel is an important commentary on social class and the repression of women's desires. Truth be told, the spicier portions of the text are no more so than those contained in today's average bodice-ripper, but Lawrence did take liberties with certain four-letter words that were forbidden from print.

test article image
D.H. Lawrence in 1929. (Unknown author/Wikimedia Commons)

The Obscene Publications Act

Lady Chatterley's Lover was first published privately in 1928 in Italy and then in France the next year, but U.K. obscenity laws permitted Penguin Books to publish only a heavily censored edition in the country in 1932. The missing text was crucial to understanding Lawrence's vision, so in 1960, the year after the country's Obscene Publications Act was passed, Penguin published the full story to test the new law. The publisher reportedly sent a copy of the book straight to the director of public prosecutions, who responded by filing a lawsuit to block the publication.